|
PIMS, Inc.
Maintains 21 Portfolios of Varying Investment Styles
using
Proprietary Algorithms, Databases, and Procedures

 | CVRPM
Model Performance
The Composite Value Rank Portfolio Management
(CVRPM) system uses the Top 6 Rank historical printout library that
dates back to
March 1991. The results plotted herein are for a 20 stock
portfolio that
is updated at the end of each calendar year quarter. Performance
results
comparing the CVRPM portfolio against the S&P 500 Index
shows
the CVRPM portfolio betters the S&P 500 Index by 6.3%
annually
over the past 20.75 years. |
|
 | 23
Standard Model Portfolios Performance vs S&P 500 Index
Our historical database library of selected quantitative
printouts
provides the necessary historical data to create, maintain,
and backtest
these portfolios. Eight of the 23 stock portfolios
better the
S&P 500 Index's performance for the past year and 14 of
the 23 stock portfolios
better the S&P 500
Index over the past three years. For more detail see
this Abstract. |
|
|
 | Four
Portfolio EVALUATOR Portfolios Performance
Our investment information and analysis program released in
late September 2004 is named Portfolio EVALUATOR.
Backtested
performance data is limited to the last 29 quarters; Qtr 4, 2004
through Qtr 4, 2011. Four Top Rated 50 stock
portfolios have
been created and saved in our historical printout library
and are
part of the 23 standard portfolios. The
portfolios cover All Stocks, Large-Cap, Mid-Cap and
Small-Cap Stocks using a 15 parameter rating algorithm and our
3,000
stock database. The last 12 quarters performance results
indicates
the 50 Top Rated Multi Cap, Large Cap, and
Small Cap Stock Portfolios compare favorably with the
S&P 500 Index.
The Mid Cap Portfolio betters the S&P 500 Index by 5.2%
on a 3
year annualized basis (19.4% vs 14.2%). |
|
|

Disclaimer: All of the PIMS, Inc. backtested
performance results are
hypothetical and do not represent performance of actual
portfolios. Proprietary, fixed, step-by-step procedures were
utilized for
all of the
portfolios. All documentation together with the historical
database library are the property of PIMS, Inc. and reside at our
office.
Future performance may not equal or exceed past performance.

|
|